With the sweeping presence of technology today, the boundary between work life and home life has become increasingly blurred. A new bill recently introduced to the California legislature seeks to change that by protecting employees’ “right to disconnect.”   

Assembly Bill 2751, introduced by Assemblyman Matt Haney (D-San Francisco), proposes to add a Section 1198.2 to the Labor Code that would effectively prevent employers from contacting employees outside of working hours, with limited exceptions.

Specifically, the proposed law would require private and public employers to establish a workplace policy that provides employees the “right to disconnect” from communications from the employer during nonworking hours, which must be established by written agreement. The “right to disconnect” means that an employee has the right to ignore communications from the employer during the agreed-upon nonworking hours.

The bill creates two limited exceptions that allow the employer to contact the employee during nonworking hours: (1) an emergency (defined as an “unforeseen situation that threatens an employee, customer, or the public; disrupts or shuts down operations; or causes physical or environmental damage”) or (2) a change to the employee’s schedule that happens within 24 hours of the scheduled shift.

If an employer commits three or more violations of the “right to disconnect,” this is considered a “pattern of violation” that allows the employee to file a complaint with the Labor Commissioner, punishable by a civil penalty of $100.

If the bill passes in the Legislature, it will head to Governor Newsom’s desk for signature and could become effective in January 2025.  If signed into law, it undoubtedly will have a significant impact on California employers across a variety of industries. For example, certain client-service industries where employees are typically expected to remain “on-call” after normal business hours would need to come to a mutual agreement with their employees regarding their nonworking hours. Employers should therefore keep a close eye on this bill.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Mark Theodore Mark Theodore

Mark Theodore is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department. He has devoted his practice almost exclusively to representing management in all aspects of traditional labor law matters throughout the U.S. He is Co-Chair of Proskauer’s Labor-Management and Collective Bargaining Practice…

Mark Theodore is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department. He has devoted his practice almost exclusively to representing management in all aspects of traditional labor law matters throughout the U.S. He is Co-Chair of Proskauer’s Labor-Management and Collective Bargaining Practice Group.

Some recent highlights of his career include:

  • Successfully defended client against allegations that it had terminated a union supporter and isolated another. T-Mobile USA, Inc., 365 NLRB No. 15 (2017).
  • Successfully appealed NLRB findings that certain of client’s written policies violated the National Labor Relations Actions Act.  T-Mobile USA, Inc., 363 NLRB No. 171 (2016), enf’d in part, rev’d in part 865 F.3d 265 (5th Cir. 2017).
  • Represented major utility in NLRB proceedings related to organizing of planners.  Secured utility-wide bargaining unit. Bargained on behalf of grocery chain.  After negotiations reached an impasse, guided the company through lawful implementation of five year collective bargaining agreement.
  • Coordinated employer response in numerous strike situations including a work stoppage across 14 western states of the client’s operations.

Mark has extensive experience representing employers in all matters before the NLRB, including representation petitions, jurisdictional disputes and the handling of unfair labor practice charges from the date they are filed through trial and appeal. Mark has acted as lead negotiator for dozens of major companies in a variety of industries, including national, multi-unit, multi-location, multi-employer and multi-union bargaining. Mark has handled lockout and strike situations, coordinating the clients efforts.

In addition, Mark has handled hundreds of arbitrations involving virtually every area of dispute, including contract interest arbitration, contract interpretation, just cause termination/discipline, benefits, pay rates, and hours of work.

Photo of Laura Vaughn Laura Vaughn

Laura Vaughn is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Employment Litigation & Arbitration Practice Group and Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Practice Group.

Laura has experience defending employers in a variety of employment actions, with…

Laura Vaughn is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Employment Litigation & Arbitration Practice Group and Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Practice Group.

Laura has experience defending employers in a variety of employment actions, with a significant focus on class, collective, and representative actions involving wage and hour issues, including the following:

  • Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA)
  • Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
  • Meal and Rest Breaks
  • Reimbursement of Expenses
  • Off-the-Clock Work
  • Wage Statements
  • Final Pay

She also counsels employers on a diverse range of employment issues.

Laura has represented clients in a number of industries, including retail, hospitality, and communications.

Laura received her B.A. from UCLA, cum laude, and J.D. from USC Gould School of Law, where she was a member of the Hale Moot Court Honors Program.