Remember when the workday ended at 5:00 pm?

In today’s always-on world, the “infinite workday” has quietly taken over—creeping into dinners, weekends, and even that quaint concept known as a “vacation.”  With smartphones in every pocket and teams spread across multiple time zones, work now follows us everywhere.  Microsoft’s 2025 Work Trend Index confirms what many leaders already sense: work is no longer confined by time or place—it’s always on. 

The data is striking. By 6:00 a.m., 40% of workers are already checking email. During core hours, employees are interrupted every two minutes by meetings, messages, and alerts.  And the day doesn’t end at dinner—nearly a third of workers are back in their inboxes by 10:00 p.m.  Weekend work is also on the rise with nearly 20% of employees checking email before noon on Saturdays and Sundays.  While the flexibility to work anytime, anywhere can be empowering, it also brings legal, operational, and cultural challenges that employers ignore at their peril.

The Rise of the “Right to Disconnect”

The infinite workday isn’t just stretching schedules – it’s stretching people thin.  Microsoft’s data shows that one in three employees say the pace of work has made it impossible to keep up. Half of employees and leaders describe their work as chaotic and fragmented. 

A major driver of this strain is the overwhelming volume of digital communication.  According to the Index, on average, employees receive more than 100 emails and 150 Teams messages every workday.  In fact, some exasperated workers have declared “email bankruptcy” – deleting their entire inbox of unanswered emails in an effort to regain control.  It’s a clear sign that employees are struggling to keep up with the volume and velocity of communication.

In response, governments around the world are stepping in with “right to disconnect” laws – designed to protect employees from the expectation of 24/7 availability.  Countries including Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, France, Slovenia, and Spain have enacted laws limiting after-hours communications.  Our neighbors in Ontario, Canada mandate written disconnect-from-work policies for employers with 25+ employees.

While the U.S. has no such law yet, the conversation is gaining traction.  As we reported last year, California proposed but ultimately did not enact a right-to-disconnect law in 2024, and New Jersey introduced similar legislation that remains under review.

Legal Risks for Employers

Even in the absence of formal legislation, the risks of an always-on culture are real and growing:

  • Wage and Hour Violations.  Non-exempt (“hourly”) employees working off the clock – even voluntarily—can trigger wage claims, class actions, and penalties under the Fair Labor Standards Act and comparable state laws. 
  • Mental Health and Burnout.  Constant connectivity can lead to stress-related claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, Family Medical Leave Act, and comparable state laws as well as workers’ compensation rules.
  • Data Privacy and Security.  After-hours work on personal or unsecured devices increases the risk of data breaches and non-compliance with laws such as the California Privacy Rights Act and the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation.
  • Discrimination and Equity Concerns.  An always-on culture may disproportionately impact caregivers, parents, and employees in different time zones—raising potential claims of disparate impact or failure to accommodate.

Best Practices

To stay ahead of legal and cultural shifts, employers should consider the following steps:

  • Establish Clear Boundaries.  Define expectations for work hours and after-hours communication in policies and handbooks, especially for non-exempt employees.
  • Train Managers.  Educate leaders on the legal risks and model healthy behavior around availability and responsiveness.
  • Audit Timekeeping Systems.  Ensure all work—especially by non-exempt employees— is accurately tracked and compensated.
  • Encourage Disconnecting.   Promote a culture that values rest and recovery, and discourage after-hours messages unless truly necessary.

Final Thoughts

The infinite workday is here—but it doesn’t have to mean infinite liability.  By understanding the evolving legal landscape and implementing thoughtful, proactive polices, employers can protect both their workforce and their business.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Tony Oncidi Tony Oncidi

Anthony J. Oncidi is the Co-Chair Emeritus of the Labor & Employment Law Department and heads the West Coast Labor & Employment group in the firm’s Los Angeles office.

Tony represents employers and management in all aspects of labor relations and employment law…

Anthony J. Oncidi is the Co-Chair Emeritus of the Labor & Employment Law Department and heads the West Coast Labor & Employment group in the firm’s Los Angeles office.

Tony represents employers and management in all aspects of labor relations and employment law, including litigation and preventive counseling, wage and hour matters, including class actions, wrongful termination, employee discipline, Title VII and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, executive employment contract disputes, sexual harassment training and investigations, workplace violence, drug testing and privacy issues, Sarbanes-Oxley claims and employee raiding and trade secret protection. A substantial portion of Tony’s practice involves the defense of employers in large class actions, employment discrimination, harassment and wrongful termination litigation in state and federal court as well as arbitration proceedings, including FINRA matters.

Tony is recognized as a leading lawyer by such highly respected publications and organizations as the Los Angeles Daily JournalThe Hollywood Reporter, and Chambers USA, which gives him the highest possible rating (“Band 1”) for Labor & Employment.  According to Chambers USA, clients say Tony is “brilliant at what he does… He is even keeled, has a high emotional IQ, is a great legal writer and orator, and never gives up.” Other clients report:  “Tony has an outstanding reputation” and he is “smart, cost effective and appropriately aggressive.” Tony is hailed as “outstanding,” particularly for his “ability to merge top-shelf lawyerly advice with pragmatic business acumen.” He is highly respected in the industry, with other commentators lauding him as a “phenomenal strategist” and “one of the top employment litigators in the country.”

“Tony is the author of the treatise titled Employment Discrimination Depositions (Juris Pub’g 2020; www.jurispub.com), co-author of Proskauer on Privacy (PLI 2020), and, since 1990, has been a regular columnist for the official publication of the Labor and Employment Law Section of the State Bar of California and the Los Angeles Daily Journal.

Tony has been a featured guest on Fox 11 News and CBS News in Los Angeles. He has been interviewed and quoted by leading national media outlets such as The National Law JournalBloomberg News, The New York Times, and Newsweek and Time magazines. Tony is a frequent speaker on employment law topics for large and small groups of employers and their counsel, including the Society for Human Resource Management (“SHRM”), PIHRA, the National CLE Conference, National Business Institute, the Employment Round Table of Southern California (Board Member), the Council on Education in Management, the Institute for Corporate Counsel, the State Bar of California, the California Continuing Education of the Bar Program and the Los Angeles and Beverly Hills Bar Associations. He has testified as an expert witness regarding wage and hour issues as well as the California Fair Employment and Housing Act and has served as a faculty member of the National Employment Law Institute. He has served as an arbitrator in an employment discrimination matter.

Tony is an appointed Hearing Examiner for the Los Angeles Police Commission Board of Rights and has served as an Adjunct Professor of Law and a guest lecturer at USC Law School and a guest lecturer at UCLA Law School.

Photo of Philippe A. Lebel Philippe A. Lebel

Philippe (Phil) A. Lebel represents employers in all aspects of employment litigation, including wage and hour, wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, retaliation, defamation, trade secrets, and breach of contract litigation, in both the single-plaintiff and class- and/or representative-action context, at both the trial and…

Philippe (Phil) A. Lebel represents employers in all aspects of employment litigation, including wage and hour, wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, retaliation, defamation, trade secrets, and breach of contract litigation, in both the single-plaintiff and class- and/or representative-action context, at both the trial and appellate levels, as well as before administrative agencies.

In addition to his litigation work, Phil regularly advises clients regarding compliance with federal, state and local employment laws, and assists a variety of companies and financial firms in evaluating labor and employment issues in connection with corporate transactions. Phil also has experience assisting employers with sensitive employee investigations, cutting edge-trainings, pay equity analyses and comprehensive audits of employment practices.

Phil has assisted clients in a wide array of sectors including in the biotech, education, entertainment, fashion, financial services, fitness, healthcare, high-tech, legal services, manufacturing, media, professional services, retail, sports, and staffing industries, among others.

Phil regularly speaks on emerging issues for employers and has been published or quoted in Law360, the Daily JournalThe Hollywood ReporterBusiness Insurance, and SHRM.org regarding a variety of labor and employment law topics.

Before law school, Phil was an intern with the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund, during which he assisted on political campaigns in Alabama and Georgia. Phil is a former member of the Board of Directors of the AIDS Legal Referral Panel.

Photo of Sehreen Ladak Sehreen Ladak

Sehreen Ladak is an associate in the Labor & Employment Department. She represents clients in a wide range of employment matters, including state and federal litigation, arbitration, and class actions on wage and hour, discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims. Sehreen has experience managing…

Sehreen Ladak is an associate in the Labor & Employment Department. She represents clients in a wide range of employment matters, including state and federal litigation, arbitration, and class actions on wage and hour, discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims. Sehreen has experience managing every aspect of litigation, including taking and defending depositions, arguing discovery and dispositive motions, and leading trials and labor arbitrations.

Sehreen also advises clients on various employment issues, including wage and hour compliance, onboarding procedures, employment and separation agreements, handbooks, and workplace accommodations.

In addition, Sehreen has experience in evaluating labor and employment issues in connection with corporate transactions and partners with her colleagues in corporate and executive benefits departments to provide the highest level of service. She also regularly leads employee trainings on workplace conduct and has been published in trade journals on a variety of employment law topics.

Sehreen’s clients come from a broad spectrum of industries, such as transportation, entertainment, healthcare, financial services, and retail. She leverages her experience to provide highly efficient, yet thoughtfully bespoke solutions to address her clients’ unique needs.

During law school at USC, Sehreen was the Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice’sExecutive Submissions Editor and served as a judicial extern for an administrative judge at the E.E.O.C.

Sehreen was selected to be a Protégée for Proskauer’s Women Sponsorship Program, an initiative for high performing midlevel lawyers that champions emerging leaders. She also serves as a member of the Firm’s Associate Council and Asian Lawyer Affinity Group.