Aramark Facility Services v. SEIU, 530 F.3d 817 (9th Cir. 2008)
Aramark received letters from the Social Security Administration indicating that information relating to 48 of Aramark’s employees at Staples Center did not match the SSA’s database. Suspecting immigration violations, Aramark told the employees they had three days to correct the mismatches by proving they had begun the process of applying for a new
Arteaga v. Brink’s, Inc., 163 Cal. App. 4th 327 (2008)
Brink’s employee Carlos Arteaga was the subject of an internal investigation into various shortages totaling $7,668 that occurred while he was acting in his capacity as an ATM messenger. The investigation was conducted after one of Arteaga’s managers noticed there had been 16 shortages in five months on runs in which Arteaga had been
In re BCBG Overtime Cases, 163 Cal. App. 4th 1293 (2008)
BCBG Maxazria filed a motion to strike class allegations from the complaint Christina Denkinger filed in which she and other putative class representatives alleged that BCBG misclassified its managers and assistant managers as exempt from overtime because they spend more than 50 percent of their time performing duties delegated to non-exempt employees. In
City of Oakland v. Hassey, 163 Cal. App. 4th 1477 (2008)
The city sued Kenny D. Hassey for breach of contract after he failed to reimburse it for the costs of training him to become a police officer with the Oakland Police Department. Oakland had entered into a memorandum of understanding with the Oakland Police Officers’ Association authorizing the city to require employees who
Advanced-Tech Sec. Services, Inc. v. Superior Court, 163 Cal. App. 4th 700 (2008)
Ester Roman, who was employed as a security guard for Advanced-Tech, worked 12 hours on Labor Day 2006 and eight hours on Memorial Day 2007. Advanced-Tech’s employee handbook stated that employees who worked on designated holidays, including Labor Day and Memorial Day, would be paid 1.5 times their regular rate of
Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., 529 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 2008)
Arch Wireless contracted to provide wireless text-messaging services for the City of Ontario, including its police department. Pursuant to the city’s general Computer Usage, Internet and E-mail Policy, the use of the city’s computers and other electronic equipment, networks, etc., was limited to city-related business, access was not confidential and “users should
McCarther v. Pacific Telesis Group, 163 Cal. App. 4th 176 (2008)
Kimberly McCarther alleged that her employer, SBC Services, violated Cal. Labor Code § 233 (the “kin care” leave statute) when it failed to pay her for her absence for seven consecutive workdays in 2004 to care for two of her children who were ill. McCarther and another employee sued on behalf of themselves
Profit Concepts Mgmt., Inc. v. Griffith, 162 Cal. App. 4th 950 (2008)
Profit Concepts sued Greg Griffith, a former employee, for breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets in Orange County Superior Court. Griffith, who was an Oklahoma resident at the time, moved to quash service for lack of personal jurisdiction. (The contract contained a prevailing party attorney’s fees provision.) Profit Concepts filed
Mendiondo v. Centinela Hosp. Med. Ctr., 521 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir. 2008)
Marie Bernadette Mendiondo, who worked as a nurse at the medical center, alleged she was terminated in retaliation for her complaints regarding allegedly false billing and reimbursement practices and substandard patient care in violation of the Federal and California False Claims Acts. Although the district court dismissed her claims, the Ninth Circuit
SDV/ACCI, Inc. v. AT&T Corp., 522 F.3d 955 (9th Cir. 2008)
SDV/ACCI (a consulting and staffing service company) and its principals sued AT&T after one of AT&T’s employees sent several e-mails in and outside the company stating that SDV/ACCI would no longer be providing services to AT&T because SDV/ACCI was having “financial difficulties.” The district court granted summary judgment to AT&T, but the Ninth