Malais v. Los Angeles City Fire Dep’t, 2007 WL 1229335 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)
Gregory Malais, a Captain II with the Los Angeles City Fire Department, sued the Department for disability discrimination in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act when he was given a special-duty assignment following the partial amputation of one of his legs. Captains on special-duty assignment receive the same pay
Myers v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc., 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 501 (Ct. App. 2007)
Alissa Myers, a salesperson, alleged that her supervisor, Ayman Damlahki, had sexually harassed her with numerous unwanted and unwelcome sexual advances, comments, innuendoes of a sexual nature, and numerous non-consensual physical contacts with her body, all of which created an intimidating, oppressive, hostile and offensive work environment. The trial court granted
Walsh v. IKON Office Solutions, Inc., 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 534 (Ct. App. 2007)
The trial court in this case initially granted the plaintiffs’ motion to certify a subclass of account managers who had been treated as exempt employees under the outside salesperson exemption. However, almost a year later, a different judge granted IKON’s motion to decertify the subclass on the ground that “common
Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., 2007 WL 1111233 (Cal. S. Ct. 2007)
Former store manager John Paul Murphy sued Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (KCP), a small, upscale retail clothing store, for violations of the wage and hour law, asserting that he was improperly classified as an exempt employee. After resigning his employment, Murphy filed a complaint with the Labor Commissioner. The Labor Commissioner awarded
Carter v. Escondido Union High School, 148 Cal. App. 4th 922 (2007)
James T. Carter sued the Escondido Union High School District for wrongful termination in violation of public policy after the district declined to “reelect” Carter to his probationary teaching position because he informed the school’s athletic director that the football coach had recommended a nutritional supplement to a student. A jury awarded
Patricia Adkins Ins. Agency, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 146 Cal. App. 4th 526 (2007)
The Court of Appeal granted declaratory and injunctive relief to independent contractor agents of State Farm who challenged certain trade secret and non-solicitation restrictions that State Farm sought to impose upon the agents’ employees. The agents challenged the restrictions on the ground that they constituted a
Ochoa v. Fordel, Inc., 146 Cal. App. 4th 898 (2007)
The employers in this action filed a motion to disqualify the employees’ counsel from prosecuting the action on the ground that one of their attorneys, Shelley G. Bryant, had previously been employed by a law firm representing one of the employers in the lawsuit. The Court applied the “modified substantial relationship test” and determined
Sarka v. The Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 146 Cal. App. 4th 261 (2006)
George Sarka, M.D., was employed as a primary care physician at UCLA’s student health center. He filed a grievance challenging the university’s decision to discharge him for repeatedly refusing to follow the directions of his superior to modify his approach to patient care to be more in accord with
Ward v. Circus Circus Casinos, 473 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2007)
During a meeting to distribute leaflets and inform other union members of the progress on contract negotiations, one employee, Al Williams, stood on a chair and spoke about union members’ defending their employment rights, which resulted in other participants’ chanting and shouting phrases such as “union, yes” and “we want a contract.” Soon
Christian Research Inst. v. Alnor, 2007 WL 602954 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2007)
William Alnor, a former employee of the Christian Research Institute (CRI), maintains a website that reports on the fundraising and spending practices of various Christian organizations. Suspicious of CRI’s claims that it had lost a substantial amount of money as a result of the misdirection of certain of its mail