Atascadero Unified School Dist. v. WCAB, 98 Cal. App. 4th 880 (2002)
The employee in this case filed an application for workers’ compensation benefits in which she alleged that she had suffered a psychological injury as a result of workplace gossip about her extramarital affair with a coworker. The Court of Appeal annulled the ruling of the WCAB that was in favor of the
Ortiz v. Los Angeles Police Relief Ass’n, 98 Cal. App. 4th 1288 (2002)
Cipriana Ortiz was employed as an administrator for LAPRA (a private, nonprofit association that processes employee benefits claims of current and former LAPD officers). Ortiz had access to officers’ names, residential addresses, telephone numbers, medical histories, family information, etc. During the course of her employment, Ortiz became romantically involved with and
Walia v. Aetna, Inc.,93 Cal. App. 4th 1213 (2001) ($1.26 million verdict upheld in favor of employee who refused to sign non-compete). Intel Corp. v. Hamidi, 94 Cal. App. 4th 325 (2001) (Former employee trespassed by flooding employer’s e-mail system with messages).
Kalaba v. Gray, 95 Cal. App. 4th 1416 (2002)
In this medical malpractice case, plaintiff failed to designate by name and address any of her past or present treating physicians. When the trial commenced, plaintiff identified several of her treating physicians whom she intended to call as expert witnesses. The trial court sustained defendant’s objection to plaintiff’s calling any of the treating physicians who
Phillips v. St. Mary Regional Med. Ctr., 96 Cal. App. 4th 218 (2002)
Plaintiff, a former social worker for St. Mary, a nonprofit, religiously-affiliated hospital, alleged wrongful termination in violation of the public policy against race and sex discrimination as embodied in the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), the California Constitution and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The
TBG Ins. Serv. Corp. v. Superior Court, 96 Cal. App. 4th 443 (2002)
The employer in this case had provided its employee, Robert Zieminski, with two computers – one for the office and the other to permit Zieminski to work at home. The employee had signed the company’s “electronic and telephone equipment policy,” which, among other things, notified Zieminski that the company-provided computers could
McPhearson v. The Michaels Co., 96 Cal. App. 4th 843 (2002)
Plaintiff’s attorney in this discrimination case (John Riestenberg) had represented another employee of The Michaels Company (Kevin Harris) in a similar lawsuit against the company. As part of his settlement agreement, Harris agreed to keep the terms of the agreement confidential. When Riestenberg filed the current lawsuit against the employer, the company filed
West v. Bechtel Corp., 96 Cal. App. 4th 966 (2002)
Plaintiff, a former engineer who worked for Bechtel Corp. for more than 30 years, sued the company for age discrimination and breach of contract. At trial, plaintiff received a jury verdict of $101,852.27 for lost salary and emotional distress damages. The Court of Appeal reversed the judgment on the age discrimination claim for lack
Medix Ambulance Serv., Inc. v. Superior Court, 97 Cal. App. 4th 109 (2002)
Plaintiff alleged a claim for sexual harassment arising under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) as well as a common law cause of action for sexual harassment in violation of public policy. The trial court overruled the employer’s demurrer without holding a hearing. The Court of Appeal held that
Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137 (2002)
The employer in this case, Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc., was found to have violated Section 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) when it selected four known union supporters for layoff. During a compliance hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), one of the four employees, Jose Castro, testified that he was born