‘kin care’ ‘sick leave’
California Employment Law Notes
$178,000 Judgment In Favor Of Pregnant Probationary Bus Driver Is Reversed
FEHA ‘jury instructions’ ‘mixed motive’ ‘pregnancy’
…
Supreme Court Approves Denial Of Employee’s Request For $871,000 In Attorney’s Fees
Chavez v. City of Los Angeles, 47 Cal. 4th 970 (2010)
Over the course of six years, Robert Chavez, a Los Angeles Police Department officer, and his wife filed multiple lawsuits against the LAPD and other members of the LAPD, alleging a variety of claims involving discrimination, harassment and retaliation. In this particular lawsuit, Chavez alleged the city and three of his supervisors had…
Class Representative’s Settlement And Dismissal Of His Own Claims Did Not Bar His Appeal On Behalf Of The Class
Narouz v. Charter Communications, LLC, 591 F.3d 1261 (9th Cir. 2010)
Hani Narouz filed a complaint against Charter Communications in which he alleged causes of action for wrongful termination in violation of public policy, as well as statutory violations of the California Labor Code for failure to pay wages, provide meal periods, maintain accurate itemized wage statements, and unfair competition under Business & Professions…
Ninth Circuit Certifies Questions To California Supreme Court Regarding Pharmaceutical Sales Reps
D’Este v. Bayer Corp., 565 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir. 2009)
The Ninth Circuit has certified two questions of law to be answered by the California Supreme Court pursuant to Cal. Rule of Court 8.548: (1) Does a pharmaceutical sales representative (“PSR”) qualify as an “outside salesperson” under Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders 1-2001 and 4-2001 if the PSR spends more than half the working…
Trade Secret Action Was Prosecuted In Bad Faith, $1.6 Million In Sanctions Upheld
FLIR Sys., Inc. v. Parrish, 174 Cal. App. 4th 1270 (2009)
FLIR Systems purchased Indigo Systems, which manufactures and sells microbolometers (a device used in connection with infrared cameras, night vision and thermal imaging), for $185 million in 2004. William Parrish and Timothy Fitzgibbons were shareholders and officers of Indigo before the company was sold to FLIR; after the sale, they continued working for…
FLSA Action Could Not Be Certified Under California Class Action Statute
Haro v. City of Rosemead, 174 Cal. App. 4th 1067 (2009)
Randy Haro and Robert Ballin filed an action against the city of Rosemead alleging a violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). The trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion to have the class certified pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 382 (the California class action statute) on the ground that an…
Class Member Who Failed To Timely Submit Claim Form Could Not Recover Unpaid Wages
Martorana v. Marlin & Saltzman, 2009 WL 1875681 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)
Ron Martorana was a class member in a wage and hour class action that had been filed against his former employer, Allstate Insurance Company. The Los Angeles Superior Court approved a settlement of the class action, but Martorana did not recover any portion of the settlement because he had failed to timely…
Class Action Pleading Requirements Need Not Be Satisfied To Assert Private Attorneys General Act Claim
Arias v. Superior Court, 2009 WL 1838973 (Cal. S. Ct. 2009)
Jose Arias sued his former employer, Angelo Dairy, for a number of alleged violations of the California Labor Code, including five claims that he asserted on behalf of himself as well as other current and former employees under the Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”). The trial court granted the employer’s motion to strike all…
Investor Permitted To Proceed With Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claim Against NY Life
Oravecz v. New York Life Ins. Co., 95 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)
Paul Oravecz sued Steve Roth and New York Life (which was allegedly Roth’s employer) after losing money in an investment in an offshore foreign currency trading fund, which Oravecz alleged was a “Ponzi scheme.” Among the claims Oravecz alleged against New York Life were negligent misrepresentation, failure to…