Bell v. Superior Court, 158 Cal. App. 4th 147 (2007)

Four employees of H.F. Cox Inc. d/b/a Cox Petroleum Transport filed this wage and hour class action challenging their employer’s failure to pay overtime; its requirement of off-the-clock work; its failure to provide meal and rest periods; its incorrect calculation of vacation pay; and its failure to pay pro rata vacation pay upon termination.

Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc., 509 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2007)

Adediji Adesola Soremekun, who was employed as a pharmacist at Thrifty Payless d/b/a Rite Aid, was subject to a collective bargaining agreement that existed between Rite Aid and the United Food and Commercial Workers Union. After resigning his employment, Soremekun filed a lawsuit in which he alleged claims for breach of contract, failure

Perez v. Uline, Inc., 157 Cal. App. 4th 953 (2007)

On the day that Brian Perez, a captain in the United States Marine Corps Reserves, returned to work after duty with the Reserves, his employment with Uline, Inc. was terminated. He was presented with a “Severance Agreement and Release,” offering him severance in the amount of six weeks’ salary in exchange for his execution

Sumuel v. ADVO, Inc., 155 Cal. App. 4th 1099 (2007)

In this class action, Tiffany Sumuel and Rudy Halim sued ADVO for unpaid overtime, asserting that ADVO’s policy in California of not paying supplemental salary replacement benefits to its sick or disabled managers until after they supplied proof of receipt of SDI benefits violated the “salary basis test” applicable to determining exemption from overtime.

Harris v. Superior Court, 154 Cal. App. 4th 164 (2007)

Plaintiffs, members of four coordinated class actions filed against two insurance companies, alleged they were improperly classified as exempt employees in violation of the administrative exemption from the overtime requirements of California law. Applying the Administrative/Production Worker Dichotomy analysis, the Court of Appeal concluded that plaintiffs were primarily engaged in work that fell on

White v. Starbucks Corp., 497 F. Supp. 2d 1080 (N.D. Cal. 2007) (Walker, J.)

Steve White, a former store manager for Starbucks, claimed the company had failed to (1) pay overtime wages in violation of Labor Code §§ 201 and 204 and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11070(12)(A); (2) provide meal and rest periods in violation of Labor Code §§ 226.7 and 512; and

Eicher v. Advanced Bus. Integrators, Inc., 2007 WL 1678244 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)

ABI sells computer software that is used in sports and entertainment venues to schedule staff, manage payroll, credentialing and security and to keep track of costs. ABI employed Michael Eicher to provide on-site customer service and training on the ABI software. ABI considered Eicher to be a consultant and paid him

Walsh v. IKON Office Solutions, Inc., 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 534 (Ct. App. 2007)

The trial court in this case initially granted the plaintiffs’ motion to certify a subclass of account managers who had been treated as exempt employees under the outside salesperson exemption. However, almost a year later, a different judge granted IKON’s motion to decertify the subclass on the ground that “common

Dunbar v. Albertson’s, Inc., 141 Cal. App. 4th 1422 (2006)

Maurice Dunbar, a grocery manager for Albertson’s, filed this class action in which he asserted that he and other similarly situated Albertson’s employees were misclassified as executive employees exempt from overtime. The putative class consisted of approximately 900 individuals who had worked as grocery managers for Albertson’s since 2000. In support of his motion

Harris v. Investor’s Business Daily, 138 Cal. App. 4th 28, 2006 WL 786806 (Mar. 29, 2006)

Plaintiffs were employed as telemarketers selling subscriptions to a financial newspaper, Investor’s Business Daily. The telemarketers’ compensation was based on a point system, which rewarded them for selling longer subscriptions, winning daily contests and meeting weekly sales goals. In addition, they were subject to a “chargeback” if the