IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez, 546 U.S. 21, 126 S. Ct. 514 (2005)

Non-exempt meat packing employees of IBP, Inc. (the world’s largest producer of fresh beef, pork and related products) filed a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of the employees who alleged that they should have been paid for the

Raghavan v. Boeing Co., 133 Cal. App. 4th 1120 (2005)

Krishnan Raghavan sued Boeing for defamation, among other things, based upon a written reprimand that Raghavan received in which he was accused of (1) failing to disclose all relevant information concerning a business trip he had made to Russia in April 2001 and (2) providing false or misleading information to Boeing executives during a

Cicairos v. Summit Logistics, Inc., 133 Cal. App. 4th 949 (2005)

In this case, five truck drivers/members of the Teamsters Union, sued their former employer for violations of the Labor Code and the Industrial Welfare Commission orders relating to meal periods, rest breaks and itemized wage statements. The trial court dismissed the action based on the motor carrier exemption. The Court of Appeal reversed

Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc., 35 Cal. Rptr. 3d 260 (2005)

Frank Gattuso and Ernest Sigala brought a class action on behalf of themselves and other employees of Harte- Hanks, seeking indemnification for expenses they incurred in using their personal automobiles in the discharge of their employment duties as outside sales representatives (OSR’s). Harte-Hanks presented evidence that its OSR’s were paid a higher base

Hardage v. CBS Broadcasting, Inc., 427 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 2005)

Hugh Hardage, a Local Sales Manager for KSTW-TV in Seattle, alleged that he was sexually harassed by Kathy Sparks, the station’s General Manager, who worked in Tacoma. Hardage claimed that he had been sexually harassed by Sparks on several occasions and subjected to retaliation after he rejected her advances, which occurred in the

Falkowski v. Imation Corp., 132 Cal. App. 4th 499 (2005)

Plaintiffs in this class action were employees of Cemax- Icon, Inc., a closely held company in the medical information management business. This litigation arose after Imation Corporation, a publicly traded company, acquired Cemax, which became a subsidiary of Imation. At the time of the merger, Imation replaced the employees’ Cemax employee stock options with

Brown v. Department of Corrections, 132 Cal. App. 4th 520 (2005)

Kevin Brown, a correctional officer at the High Desert Prison, alleged a violation of Labor Code § 1102.5 (the whistleblower statute) and of Government Code § 8547.8 (a similar whistleblower statute applicable to state employees), arising from statements made by the Department’s inspector general to law enforcement officials requesting official action in response

Conley v. Pacific Gas & Elec., 131 Cal. App. 4th 260 (2005)

Two senior new business representatives and two engineers of PG&E filed this class-action lawsuit, alleging that they and others had been improperly classified as exempt employees under federal and state overtime law. Plaintiffs challenged PG&E’s policy of making deductions from exempt employees’ vacation-leave accruals for partial-day absences on the ground that such

Cintas Corp., 344 NLRB No. 118 (June 30, 2005)

Cintas Corporation, which, among other things, designs and manufactures corporate uniforms, maintained a provision in its employee handbook stating that it honors the confidentiality of its clients, their business plans, partners, new business efforts, customers, accounting and financial matters. Included among the types of behavior that could result in disciplinary action was “violating a confidence

Diaz v. Gates, 420 F.3d 897, 2005 WL 1949879 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc)

David Diaz sued Daryl Gates, Willie Williams, Bernard Parks and many others, alleging violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) as a result of damages he allegedly suffered from police misconduct associated with the LAPD Rampart scandal. One of the elements of a RICO claim is that