The California Court of Appeal in Aleman v. AirTouch Cellular has addressed for the first time; (1) whether reporting time pay applies to training meetings which are scheduled in advance; (2) whether Split-shift premium pay should be paid if an employee earns more than the minimum wage for all hours worked plus one additional hour of pay in a workday; and, (3) whether employers may
split shifts
January 2012 California Employment Law Notes
By Tony Oncidi on
We invite you to review our newly-posted January 2012 California Employment Law Notes – a comprehensive review of the latest and most significant developments in California employment law. The highlights include:
- Insurance Claims Adjusters May Be Exempt Administrative Employees
- Attorney Was Properly Denied Precertification Discovery To Find A New Class Representative
- Employee-Attorney’s $440,000 Verdict Against LA Housing Authority Is Affirmed
- $160,000 Sexual Harassment Verdict And
…
Claims For Reporting Time Pay And Split Shifts Were Properly Dismissed
By Tony Oncidi on
Aleman v. AirTouch Cellular, 202 Cal. App. 4th 117 (2011)
Daniel Krofta and Mary Katz filed this putative class action against their employer, alleging reporting time pay violations and seeking additional compensation for working split shifts. Krofta sought reporting time pay for days he attended meetings at work even though he was furnished work (and was paid) for at least half of the scheduled…