Polone v. CIR, 473 F.3d 1019 (9th Cir. 2007)

Gavin Polone sued his former employer, United Talent Agency, alleging, among other things, wrongful termination and defamation. In settlement of the defamation claim, Polone agreed to accept $4 million in four equal, six-month installments, beginning on May 3, 1996. Congress amended Section 104 of the Internal Revenue Code in August 1996 (after the first but

United States v. Tuff, 469 F.3d 1249 (9th Cir. 2006)

James H. Tuff received non-qualified stock options as an employee of RealNetworks, which he twice exercised in 1999 to purchase shares in the company that were worth more than $460,000. Tuff contended that he realized income only when the shares were later liquidated by Morgan Stanley (and were worth substantially less) rather than when

Polone v. CIR, 499 F.3d 1041 (9th Cir. 2006)

Gavin Polone sued his former employer, United Talent Agency, alleging, among other things, wrongful termination and defamation. In settlement of the defamation claim, Polone agreed to accept $4 million in four equal, six-month installments, beginning on May 3, 1996. Congress amended Section 104 of the Internal Revenue Code in August 1996 (after the first but

CIR v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426, 125 S. Ct. 826 (2005)

In these consolidated cases, John W. Banks, II and Sigitas J. Banaitis failed to report as income portions of a settlement (in Banks’s case) and a favorable judgment (in Banaitis’s case) that were paid to their attorneys. The United States Supreme Court held that when a litigant’s recovery constitutes income, the income includes

Biehl v. CIR, 351 F.3d 982 (9th Cir. 2003)

Frank Biehl brought suit against his former employer, North Coast Medical Center, Inc. (NCMI), and won a jury verdict in his wrongful termination action against the company. NCMI agreed to settle the case for $1.2 million, of which $401,000 was paid directly to Biehl’s attorney. Biehl reported only $799,000 of the $1.2 million (i.e., his

Banaitis v. CIR, 340 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2003)

In his tort claims against his former employer (Bank of California) and its successor (Mitsubishi Bank), Sigitas Banaitis alleged wrongful discharge and interference with his employment agreement. After losing at trial in Oregon state court (where Banaitis obtained a $6.27 million verdict in his favor) and failing in their appeals, Mitsubishi Bank and the Bank

Jalali v. Root, 109 Cal. App. 4th 1768 (2003)

Farideh Jalali sued her former employer for racial discrimination and sexual harassment. During the first phase of the trial, the jury awarded Jalali $750,000 in compensatory damages. During the punitive damages phase of the trial, the employer offered to settle the matter for $2.75 million for all claims, conditioned on confidentiality. Jalali accepted the offer